Neurotoxicity of Cancer Immunotherapies Including CAR T Cell Therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To outline the spectrum of neurotoxicity seen with approved immunotherapies and in pivotal clinical trials including immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, vaccine therapy, and oncolytic viruses. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been an exponential growth in new immunotherapies, which has transformed the landscape of oncology treatment. With more widespread use of cancer immunotherapies, there have also been advances in characterization of its associated neurotoxicity, research into potential underlying mechanisms, and development of management guidelines. Increasingly, there is also mounting interest in long-term neurologic sequelae. Neurologic complications of immunotherapy can impact every aspect of the central and peripheral nervous system. Early recognition and treatment are critical. Expanding indications for immunotherapy to solid and CNS tumors has led to new challenges, such as how to reliably distinguish neurotoxicity from disease progression. Our evolving understanding of immunotherapy neurotoxicity highlights important areas for future research and the need for novel immunomodulatory therapeutics.

Novel trial designs in neuro-oncology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: An important factor contributing to the low rate of success in identifying effective therapies for brain tumor patients is the slow, inefficient, and expensive process of drug development, as well as small patient numbers, low patient participation in clinical trials, and reluctance of patients to enroll in ineffective control arms. In recent years, a number of novel trial designs have been developed to try to address some of these issues. RECENT FINDINGS: Surgical 'window-of-opportunity' trials that evaluate tumor drug concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects provide invaluable early data early guiding the development of novel therapies. Basket and bucket trials facilitate the development of therapies that target specific biomarkers subsets. Platform trials utilizing Bayesian adaptive randomization and shared control arms such as the INSIGhT and GBM-AGILE trials increase the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of developing novel therapies. There is also growing interest in leveraging external control arms with patient level data to evaluate efficacy in single arm trials, and facilitate interim analysis and potentially reduce the number of control patients in randomized trials. SUMMARY: These novel designs will hopefully reduce the inefficiencies of developing novel therapies in neuro-oncology and facilitate the identification of more effective therapies for brain tumor patients.

Case Report of Spinal Cord Involvement in Susac Syndrome Masquerading as a Multiple Sclerosis Mimic.

We present a unique case of a 59-year-old woman with atypical Susac syndrome and prominent involvement of the spinal cord. She initially presented with progressive headaches, lower extremity weakness and hearing loss. Her MRI brain showed multiple enhancing lesions and her MRI spine showed a T8 enhancing lesion as well as a C2 cord infarct. She was treated with IV methylprednisolone with initial stabilization. However, she developed worsening encephalopathy and lower extremity weakness. Her repeat MRI brain showed new bilateral enhancing lesions and subacute infarcts. Given the increased burden of new lesions, she underwent a brain biopsy, which showed perivascular chronic inflammation within a small vessel distribution. Additionally, fluorescein angiography revealed bilateral branch retinal arterial occlusion (BRAO) and an audiogram demonstrated bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. She was diagnosed with Susac syndrome and treated with IV cyclophosphamide with improvement in her clinical exam. Spinal cord involvement is extremely rare for Susac syndrome, which commonly manifests as the classic triad of encephalopathy, BRAO and hearing loss. Her presentation with myelopathy highlights the importance of considering atypical presentations of well-established syndromes for optimal diagnosis and management.

Clinical Problem Solving: A 56-Year-Old Woman With Right Facial Weakness, Numbness, and Diplopia.

We discuss a case of a middle-aged woman with a history of urothelial carcinoma, who presented with subacute progression of double vision, right facial numbness, and back pain. Her MRI brain and spine demonstrated multifocal enhancing lesions at the skull base and throughout the spine. Since her initial serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies were unrevealing, she underwent a biopsy of her skull base lesion, which was initially concerning for infection. However, her symptoms worsened despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, necessitating a spinal root biopsy that was consistent with leptomeningeal urothelial carcinoma. Her case illustrates the challenge of accurately diagnosing isolated leptomeningeal metastatic disease, which can be difficult to diagnose from CSF analysis and often requires multiple lumbar punctures to improve sensitivity. While genitourinary cancers rarely metastasize to the CNS, clinicians should retain high suspicion for neoplastic etiologies of leptomeningeal disease in patients with a history of cancer and new neurologic deficits.

Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma: Maximizing Clinical Benefit, Minimizing Neurotoxicity.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The optimal treatment for newly diagnosed and refractory or relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is not fully defined. We review the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and current management strategies for newly diagnosed PCNSL as well as emerging treatments for refractory and relapsed disease. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent decades, the incidence of PCNSL has increased in the elderly population. With advancements in chemotherapy for PCNSL, survival has improved. However, outcomes remain inferior when compared with other forms of extranodal lymphoma. Additionally, treatments can be associated with clinically significant neurotoxicities. Despite advances in the treatment of PCNSL, current treatment regimens remain suboptimal in terms of response rates and neurotoxicity. Well-tolerated agents, especially for the elderly, are still needed.

Clinical, radiological and genomic features and targeted therapy in BRAF V600E mutant adult glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Although uncommon, detection of BRAF V600E mutations in adult patients with glioblastoma has become increasingly relevant given the widespread application of molecular diagnostics and encouraging therapeutic activity of BRAF/MEK inhibitors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of adult glioblastoma patients treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital or Massachusetts General Hospital from January 2011 to July 2019 with an identified BRAF V600E mutation by either immunohistochemistry or molecular testing. Patient characteristics, molecular genomics, and preoperative MRI were analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen glioblastoma patients were included, with median age at diagnosis of 41-years-old (range 22-69). Only 1/18 was IDH1/2-mutant; 10/17 had MGMT unmethylated tumors. The most common additional molecular alterations were CDKN2A/2B biallelic loss/loss-of-function (10/13, 76.9%), polysomy 7 (8/12, 66.7%), monosomy 10 (5/12, 41.7%), PTEN biallelic loss/loss-of-function (5/13, 38.5%) and TERT promoter mutations (5/15, 33.3%). Most tumors were well-circumscribed (11/14) and all were contrast-enhancing on MRI. Twelve patients eventually developed subependymal or leptomeningeal dissemination. Six patients were treated with BRAF/MEK inhibition following disease progression after standard of care therapy, with 4/6 patients showing partial response or stable disease as best response. Median time to progression after BRAF/MEK inhibition was 6.0 months (95% CI 1.2-11.8). Grade 1 skin rash was present in 2 patients, but no other adverse events were reported. Median OS for the entire cohort was 24.1 months (95% CI 15.7-38.9). CONCLUSION: Understanding the natural history and features of BRAF V600E glioblastoma may help better identify patients for BRAF/MEK inhibition and select therapeutic strategies.

Neurologic Manifestations of the World Health Organization's List of Pandemic and Epidemic Diseases.

The World Health Organization (WHO) monitors the spread of diseases globally and maintains a list of diseases with epidemic or pandemic potential. Currently listed diseases include Chikungunya, cholera, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Ebola virus disease, Hendra virus infection, influenza, Lassa fever, Marburg virus disease, Neisseria meningitis, MERS-CoV, monkeypox, Nipah virus infection, novel coronavirus (COVID-19), plague, Rift Valley fever, SARS, smallpox, tularemia, yellow fever, and Zika virus disease. The associated pathogens are increasingly important on the global stage. The majority of these diseases have neurological manifestations. Those with less frequent neurological manifestations may also have important consequences. This is highlighted now in particular through the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and reinforces that pathogens with the potential to spread rapidly and widely, in spite of concerted global efforts, may affect the nervous system. We searched the scientific literature, dating from 1934 to August 2020, to compile data on the cause, epidemiology, clinical presentation, neuroimaging features, and treatment of each of the diseases of epidemic or pandemic potential as viewed through a neurologist's lens. We included articles with an abstract or full text in English in this topical and scoping review. Diseases with epidemic and pandemic potential can be spread directly from human to human, animal to human, via mosquitoes or other insects, or via environmental contamination. Manifestations include central neurologic conditions (meningitis, encephalitis, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, seizures), peripheral and cranial nerve syndromes (sensory neuropathy, sensorineural hearing loss, ophthalmoplegia), post-infectious syndromes (acute inflammatory polyneuropathy), and congenital syndromes (fetal microcephaly), among others. Some diseases have not been well-characterized from a neurological standpoint, but all have at least scattered case reports of neurological features. Some of the diseases have curative treatments available while in other cases, supportive care remains the only management option. Regardless of the pathogen, prompt, and aggressive measures to control the spread of these agents are the most important factors in lowering the overall morbidity and mortality they can cause.

Visual processing deficits in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome.

Carriers of the rare 22q11.2 microdeletion present with a high percentage of positive and negative symptoms and a high genetic risk for schizophrenia. Visual processing impairments have been characterized in schizophrenia, but less so in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (DS). Here, we focus on visual processing using high-density EEG and source imaging in 22q11.2DS participants (N = 25) and healthy controls (N = 26) with an illusory contour discrimination task. Significant differences between groups emerged at early and late stages of visual processing. In 22q11.2DS, we first observed reduced amplitudes over occipital channels and reduced source activations within dorsal and ventral visual stream areas during the P1 (100-125 ms) and within ventral visual cortex during the N1 (150-170 ms) visual evoked components. During a later window implicated in visual completion (240-285 ms), we observed an increase in global amplitudes in 22q11.2DS. The increased surface amplitudes for illusory contours at this window were inversely correlated with positive subscales of prodromal symptoms in 22q11.2DS. The reduced activity of ventral and dorsal visual areas during early stages points to an impairment in visual processing seen both in schizophrenia and 22q11.2DS. During intervals related to perceptual closure, the inverse correlation of high amplitudes with positive symptoms suggests that participants with 22q11.2DS who show an increased brain response to illusory contours during the relevant window for contour processing have less psychotic symptoms and might thus be at a reduced prodromal risk for schizophrenia.